Is I3 10100 Good for Video Editing?

If you are a video editor, choosing the right processor is crucial for your work. The i3 10100 is a budget processor that may seem like a good option for video editing at first glance.

But is it really a good choice? Let’s find out.

Processor Specifications

The i3 10100 is a quad-core processor with eight threads. It has a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz and can boost up to 4.3 GHz. It supports up to 64GB of DDR4 RAM and has integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Video Editing Requirements

Before we dive into whether i3 10100 is good for video editing or not, let’s first understand what video editing requires from your computer.

Video editing primarily involves three tasks – importing, editing, and exporting videos. Importing requires the processor to read large files from storage, editing requires it to perform multiple complex operations on those files simultaneously, and exporting requires it to encode the edited video into a new file format.

To perform these tasks smoothly, a processor needs to have high clock speeds, multiple cores/threads for parallel processing, and support for hardware acceleration (e.g., GPU).

Is i3 10100 Good for Video Editing?

The short answer is – it depends on your requirements.

If you are an amateur video editor who works with small projects (e., home videos), the i3 10100 can handle them reasonably well. Its quad-core design and high clock speeds make it capable of handling basic video editing tasks such as trimming, adding transitions/effects, and rendering/exporting videos in popular formats.

However, if you are a professional who works with large projects (e., feature films), the i3 10100 may not be sufficient. Professional-level video editing software such as Adobe Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or Final Cut Pro X require processors with higher core counts (e., 6, 8, or more cores) for smooth performance. The i3 10100’s quad-core design may struggle to keep up with the demands of such software.

Moreover, the i3 10100 lacks support for hardware acceleration technologies such as Quick Sync Video or CUDA, which can significantly speed up video encoding tasks. This means that exporting/rendering videos will take longer compared to processors that support these technologies (e., Intel’s higher-end CPUs or AMD Ryzen CPUs).


In conclusion, the i3 10100 is a decent budget processor for amateur video editors who work with small projects. It can handle basic video editing tasks reasonably well and won’t break the bank.

However, if you are a professional video editor who works with large projects and requires faster encoding times, we recommend investing in a higher-end CPU such as Intel’s i7/i9 or AMD Ryzen CPUs that offer more cores/threads and support for hardware acceleration technologies.